data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7b7e/f7b7e7942bae340e7f6ff757f601f4dcf6747344" alt="sidang ariel , hasil sidang ariel , hasil persidangan ariel , hasil sidang ariel 22 november"
1. Article 29 of Law No. 44 of 2008 on Pornography
2. Article 5 paragraph 3 letter b Law No. 1 of 1951 Emergency
3. Article 27 paragraph 1 Law No. 11 of 2008 on Information and Electronic Transactions (ITE)
Monday, November 22, 2010, following responses OC Kaligis when met after meeting Ariel in PN Bandung "The response today I am hearing no comment, asked the clerk, not me. Later I was accused of disseminating the results of the trial. "According to the OC, if he gives an opinion and inform the course of the hearing today, will he be exposed to charges of disseminating the results of the hearing because the hearing was declared closed.
Meanwhile, Ariel's team of lawyers from another one of them Boy Afrian Bondjol filed an objection to the indictment the prosecutor who accused Ariel helped disseminate a video that allegedly carried Ariel own. For the continuation of the trial results Ariel can we see in the next session.
No comments:
Post a Comment